Just arrested for DUI? In Arizona you have 30 days to request your MVD hearing. Start here →
DUIINF

Standards

Editorial policy

Who writes this, who checks it, how AI is used and where it is not allowed to decide anything, and how the platform is paid. On a subject where being wrong has consequences, those four answers matter more than the writing.

Who publishes this

DUIINFO.NET is published by DUIINFO LLC, an independent company. It is not a law firm, it does not practise law, and no one here represents you. People who want a lawyer are referred to independent firms; that referral is the entire relationship between this platform and any law practice.

Legal review

Every legal figure published here — statutory citations, penalty ranges, deadlines, licence consequences — is read against its primary source and accepted by an attorney before it goes live, and that review is recorded on the row with the reviewer’s name and the date. Explanatory and procedural writing is drafted editorially and checked against the verified figures rather than against other websites.

Review means confirming that the statute says what we say it says, and that the citation points where we claim. It is not a legal opinion about any jurisdiction’s law, and it is not advice — which is why the reviewer does not need to be admitted in the state a given row describes. What is published is the text of a public statute and a link to it.

We publish the verification date rather than a vague “reviewed by our legal team” badge. A date is checkable; a badge is decoration.

How AI is used, and what it is not allowed to do

AI does the work it is good at: retrieving primary-source documents, proposing structured rows from statutory text, drafting explanations, and flagging inconsistencies between our own pages. Every one of those outputs is a proposal.

AI does not decide what is published. It cannot accept a row into the reference, cannot resolve a conflict between two figures, and cannot fill a gap where verification is missing. Where a value is unverified, the system is built to show nothing rather than to generate something plausible — that behaviour is enforced in code, not by policy alone.

How this is funded, and what money cannot buy

The reference is free. Revenue comes from paid self-help tools for people representing themselves, and from referral relationships with independent law firms.

No law firm can pay to change a figure, to be described more favourably in explanatory content, or to have an unfavourable fact removed. Referral placement is disclosed where it appears. If a firm we refer to would prefer a page said something else, the page still says what the statute says.

Reuse

The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to duiinfo.net. Machine-readable endpoints are listed at /data. We would rather be quoted correctly by everyone than fenced off and paraphrased badly.

Related

Last updated . DUIINFO LLC is not a law firm and nothing on this site is legal advice.